I worked out a new voting system that,
combining the good points of paper voting with those of computing,
guarantees quick, honest and verifiable results.
Please read details at
www.ClearVoting.com
Elections are the way by which Democracies use to "measure" people´s will and thus to assign political power.
Therefore the electoral mechanism is of primary importance for any democracy since
mistakes and fraud can give political power to those who should´nt have it.
Our ancestors knew that very well and thus
pretended counting procedures to be open to the public and verifiable.
In the 21th century
we, the people, still need counting procedures to be open to the public and verifiable.
Infact this is the only way we can hope to have honest results even in case elections are dishonestly managed
by incumbent governments or
fraudulently attacked by politicians, economic lobbies, criminal organizations, terroristic groups or
foreign countries.
For Democracy to exist it is absolutely necessary that the electoral mechanism
simultaneously:
- allows to vote only those having the rigth to vote,
- ensures a verifiable correspondence between results and electors´ will,
- ensures that each vote is kept secret from everybody.
The adjective
verifiable (point 2) is extremely important: it doesn´t mean we trust the way
ballots are colleced and results counted, but that we can precisely verify electoral results.
No matter how perfect the electoral mechanism might be, if results were not verifiable we should rely on
any figure provided to us: nobody would call "democracy" such situation.
Secrecy (point 3) is an absolute necessity since the existence of records that could be
used to identify the voters and their
vote means the end of political freedom. Infact, if there is a risk of voting
preferences becoming known to interested parties, voters will inevitably
be influenced: they could undergo illecit pressure to vote as somebody else likes.
This is not a theoretical problem, but a real one in many parts of the world where criminals (and/or
governments and/or politicians) have enough power to compell people to vote in a certain way.
Any form of vote disclosure could even be used to discriminate people in giving or denying
promotions, jobs, contracts, etc.
Electors can't be given any "receipt" stating the content of the vote since:
- people could be encouraged to sell their own vote because they could demonstrate whom they actually voted
for.
- such a "receipt", whichever media could be made of, could be used as a way to verify if the
threatened elector really obeyed: gangsters can compell electors to show the "receipt"
in order to verify such obedience!
The electoral mechanism, far from being a technical detail,
is the heart of any democracy and thus we all MUST know and accept it
As an example of very good democratic control on elections´ procedures and results, please
have a look at
the way paper ballot elections are done in
Italy.
The site is made of several .
You can change clicking on the
or pressing the access keys
1
and
2.
Some chapters are made of several .
You can change clicking on the
or pressing the access keys
3
and
4.
Access keys are described in the
Accessibility page.
Site Map is in this
Site Map page.